Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Do intrauterine device/intrauterine system users check their threads?
Free
  1. Amanda Davies1,
  2. Charlotte Fleming2
  1. 1Specialist Registrar in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Aneurin Bevan Health Board – Sexual and Reproductive Health, Newport, UK
  2. 2Consultant in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Aneurin Bevan Health Board – Sexual and Reproductive Health, Newport, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Amanda Davies, Aneurin Bevan Health Board – Sexual and Reproductive Health, Llanyrafon House, Llanfrechfa Grange, Torfaen, Cwmbran NP44 8YN, UK; daviesac4{at}cf.ac.uk

Abstract

Background Expulsion of an intrauterine device (IUD) occurs in about 1 in 20 women and expulsion may not be noticed by the user. Current guidance recommends that users are instructed to check regularly for their threads. This is the first study to explore the reality of how women feel about checking their threads and the details surrounding how frequently checks are done.

Methods One hundred consecutive IUD users were interviewed regarding their type of device, duration of use, frequency of thread checking, prompts for checking and reasons for not checking.

Results Only 23% checked their threads regularly and 51% had never done so. The most common reason for not checking was forgetting about it.

Conclusions Despite being advised to do so, the majority of users do not check their threads at all and fewer than one-quarter of them check regularly. We propose that advice offered about thread checking should be given less emphasis and suggested more for user reassurance.

  • intrauterine devices
  • intrauterine systems
  • long-acting reversible contraception
  • qualitative research

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Highlights from this issue
    British Medical Journal Publishing Group