Article Text

PDF
Cost savings from simple interventions to reduce unnecessary urinary investigations
  1. Rachael Viney1,
  2. Diana J Mansour2
  1. 1 Northumbria GP Training Programme, Health Education North East, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  2. 2 New Croft Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rachael Viney, Northumbria GP Training Programme, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK; rachael.viney{at}nhs.net

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Why was a change in practice needed?

There is pressure on the NHS as a whole to reduce costs to meet the challenge of the NHS Five Year Forward View of delivering an estimated £22 billion of productivity improvements by 2020/2021.1 One opportunity to save money is to deliver care according to best practice guidelines. We therefore decided to focus on managing patients with suspected bacterial urinary tract infections (UTIs) as there are best practice guidelines available. In 2014 our integrated Sexual Health Service in the North East of England sent 849 mid-stream urine (MSU) samples to the local laboratory costing £3956. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) has produced a guideline for the management of suspected bacterial UTIs in adults (SIGN 88) which provides recommendations, based on current evidence for best practice, for diagnosing and managing adults with community acquired lower UTIs.2

A summary of the SIGN 88 guideline for the management of suspected bacterial UTIs in adults is shown in box.

Box

Summary of Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline for management of suspected bacterial urinary tract infections …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.