Table 2

Indicators to evaluate the impact of the Family Planning Care Guideline flipchart on the quality of family planning services

Data collection method
IndicatorsBaseline round (%)
(n=448)
Post-intervention round (%)
(n=547)
p*ObservationExit interview
Process indicators
(a) Contraceptive method selection
1Informed choice of method by client6498<0.01
2Provider helped client with decision-making process5396<0.01
(b) Information given to the clients
3Giving information about all FP methods58800.04
4Giving information about efficacy of chosen method5488<0.01
5Giving information about using chosen method81980.04
6Giving information about complications of chosen method67940.03
(c) Technical competence of the provider
7Delivering tailored information by provider4690<0.01
8Correcting wrong beliefs of the client about FP71860.04
9Answering all the client's questions89990.04
(d) Client-provider interpersonal interactions
10Encouraging client to speak75930.04
11Speaking with client in simple and understandable manner96980.89
12Possibility of client asking questions freely92990.61
13Delivering simple explanations about chosen FP method951000.72
14Actively listening to the client93990.66
15Giving enough time to client to speak88980.46
16Empathy with the client46570.28
17Observing the principles of non-verbal communication85980.04
18Observing the principles of verbal communication in counselling75970.04
19Encountering privacy and confidentiality as client's right98990.94
20Greeting client by provider991000.94
Outcome indicators
21Client chooses own contraceptive method by end of session90950.04
22Obtaining overall good result from FP counselling session85960.03
23Client would recommend use of FP services to others5698<0.01
24Client satisfaction with services72990.03
  • *Values for p are calculated using Student's t-test.

  • FP, family planning.