Method chosen by women who were offered all three methods of emergency contraception following the introduction of the revised FSRH guidelines
| 2012 | LNG [n (%)]* | UPA [n (%)] | Cu-IUD [n (%)] | Total (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March | 107 (54.9) | 79 (40.5) | 9 (4.6) | 195 |
| April | 109 (55.3) | 79 (40.1) | 9 (4.6) | 197 |
| May | 127 (54.5) | 91 (39.1) | 15 (6.4) | 233 |
| Total | 343 (54.9) | 249 (39.8) | 33 (5.3) | 625 |
*The percentage figures in parentheses refer to the percentage of each month's EC episodes of women choosing one of the three methods.
Cu-IUD, copper-bearing intrauterine contraceptive device; EC, emergency contraception; FSRH, Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare; LNG, levonorgestrel; UPA, ulipristal acetate.