Table 1

Survey of local anaesthesia usage for intrauterine device insertion by UK health professionals

Categories of respondents and use of LA for IUD insertion [n (%)]
Main workplace (service) (n=128) (p=0.056)IUD insertion experience (years) (n=129) (p=0.046)IUD insertions performed in the last year (n) (n=127) (p=0.010)LA type most frequently used (n=110*) (p=0.620)
Frequency of use of LA for IUD insertionIntegrated SRHGeneral practiceContraception onlyHospital>52–5<2>5013–50≤12Topical gel onlyInjectable onlyBoth gel and injectable
Yes, always18 (14)5 (4)10 (8)3 (2)27 (21)7 (6)2 (1)27 (21)7 (5)2 (2)16 (15)10 (9)10 (9)
Yes, sometimes28 (22)19 (15)13 (10)0 (0)57 (44)2 (1)2 (1)44 (35)14 (11)1 (1)28 (25)9 (8)21 (19)
No, hardly ever10 (8)13 (10)8 (6)1 (1)25 (21)5 (4)2 (1)14 (11)13 (10)5 (4)8 (7)4 (4)4 (4)
Total56 (44)37 (29)31 (24)4 (3)109 (86)14 (11)6 (3)85 (67)34 (26)8 (7)52 (47)23 (21)35 (32)
  • *Sixteen ‘No, hardly ever’ and two ‘Yes, sometimes’ respondents did not answer this question.

  • IUD, intrauterine device; LA, local anaesthesia; SRH, sexual and reproductive health.