Original research articlePreventing repeat abortion in Canada: is the immediate insertion of intrauterine devices postabortion a cost-effective option associated with fewer repeat abortions?☆
Introduction
In 2005, 97,254 abortions were performed in Canada [1], 38% of which were repeat abortions [2]. Canadian women requiring repeat abortion have increased risk for sexually transmitted infections and intimate partner violence [3]. Further, women have increased rates of unintended pregnancy when exposed to both intimate partner reproductive control and violence [4], and disadvantaged women experience higher rates of unintended pregnancy than more affluent women [5]. Immediate insertion of intrauterine devices (IUDs) is known to be highly effective [6], [7], [8], safe [9], [10] and desirable [11] as postabortion contraception. Previous studies seeking to determine the effect of immediate IUD insertion on repeat abortion rates have been carried out in large urban settings where women have multiple options for abortion care facilities. Thus, the rates of repeat visit to the index facility may be less than ideally indicative of a true rate of repeat abortion.
We focused our research on women seeking abortions within a Canadian health region where a single clinic primarily provides the abortion services for a region with several hundred thousand residents. As a result, women are more likely to return to this clinic for subsequent abortions in the event of a repeat unintended pregnancy. We aimed to demonstrate rates of repeat abortion in a Canadian population categorized by initial choice of contraception postabortion and to determine cost-effectiveness from the health system perspective for the provision of free copper IUDs postabortion. The intention of this analysis is to inform health system decision makers of possible benefits accrued by the immediate provision of long-acting reversible contraception following abortion.
Section snippets
Setting, participants and outcomes
A retrospective observational cohort study examined all abortions performed at the sole abortion clinic in the health region from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2004, and January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2008, on residents of the same health region.
Data were collected on an intention-to-treat basis for five groups by choice of postabortion contraception: (1) immediate insertion of a copper IUD (Flexi-T 300; Prosan), (2) immediate supply of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), (3) immediate
Results
In 2003 and 2004, 1101 residents of this health region underwent abortions at the clinic and 681 residents underwent abortions in 2008. Women choosing IUDs in 2003–2004 were older and with higher parity than those choosing OCPs, and this difference declined in the 2008 cohort (Table 2, Table 3).
To compare demographics between the 2003–2004 and the 2008 cohorts, p values were obtained for each demographic variable. No significant differences were observed between subjects in these groups when
Discussion
Data obtained from the 2003–2004 and 2008 groups are comparable in terms of most patient demographics. However, the statistically significant difference in mean maternal age is a potential confounder. The increase between the two study periods in mean gestational age is related to an increased wait time from initial contact to request an appointment to the admission for receiving abortion care.
The decreased mean maternal age of women selecting IUDs postabortion between the 2003–2004 and 2008
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Jonathan Berkowitz for his support in statistical analyses. Additionally, we are grateful for the many hours of assistance in data collection by A.G.
References (18)
- et al.
Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy
Contraception
(2010) - et al.
Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion
Contraception
(2008) - et al.
Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion
Contraception
(2008) - et al.
Cochrane systematic reviews of IUD trials: lessons learned
Contraception
(2007) - et al.
Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion
Contraception
(2009) - et al.
Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination
Contraception
(2011) - et al.
The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception
Steroids
(2000) - et al.
Uptake and adherence to long-acting reversible contraception post-abortion
Contraception
(2010) - et al.
Cost savings from emergency contraceptive pills in Canada
Obstet Gynecol
(2001)
Cited by (44)
Continuation of Contraception Following Termination of Pregnancy in a Canadian Urban Centre
2022, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaTrends and determinants of postabortion contraception use in a Canadian retrospective cohort
2019, ContraceptionCitation Excerpt :IUD increased throughout the duration of the study period. In comparison to OCP and DMPA, IUD users had approximately half the odds of having a subsequent abortion at 1 or 5 years after the index abortion, confirming the results of the previous study [5]. These results also agree with studies performed in the United States, Finland, Sweden and New Zealand, which found that IUDs are significantly more effective at reducing subsequent abortions than OCP [4,6–9].
Consensus canadien sur la contraception (partie 3 de 4): chapitre 7 - Contraception intra-utérine
2019, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
- ☆
Sources of funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge the British Columbia College of Family Physicians’ Research Award and the College of Family Physicians of Canada Research and Education Foundation. We extend our thanks to the Federation of Medical Women of Canada for awarding the Margaret Owens-Waite Memorial Fund in support of presenting this research.