Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T14:06:27.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sterilisation of intellectually disabled women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

L. Servais ,
R. Leach ,
D. Jacques  and
J.P. Roussaux
L. Servais*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrophysiology (Professor Cheron), Université de Mons Hainaut, Avenue du champ de Mars, 7000 Mons, Belgium
R. Leach
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Clinique Notre Dame de Grâce, Chaussée de Nivelles 212, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium
D. Jacques
Affiliation:
Department of Psychopathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200Brussels, Belgium
J.P. Roussaux
Affiliation:
Department of Psychopathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200Brussels, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:servais.laurent@ulb.ac.be
Get access

Abstract

Objective

To point out the proportion of intellectually disabled women (IDW) who are sterilised, and the medical and social factors associated with an increased probability to be sterilised.

Study design

A population-based study among 97% of IDW aged 18–46, attending government-accredited institutions in the region of Brussels-Capital and the province of Walloon Brabant (Belgium).

Results

Among the IDW included in this study, 22.2% are sterilised, which is superior to the 7% in the general Belgian population. Factors associated with an increased probability to be sterilised are: living in an institution, having a higher intellectual quotient (IQ), being enrolled in an institution where sexual intercourse is authorised and attending an institution where contraception is required. The last three factors are significant only among women living in institutions and the last two, only in women with severe disability. Among IDW using contraception, no factor was associated with a greater probability to be sterilised.

Conclusion

The prevalence of sterilisation among IDW is three times higher than that in the Belgian population and it is mainly correlated with factors related to the institution where these women live, especially the severely disabled.

Keywords

SterilisationContraceptionSexualityMental retardationIntellectual disability
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 19 , Issue 7 , November 2004 , pp. 428 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brahams, D. Sterilisation of a mentally incapable woman. Lancet 1989;1:1275–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comité consultatif de Bioéthique de Belgique: Avis du 14 septembre 1998 relatif à la stérilisation des handicapés mentaux.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comité Consultatif National d’Ethique: La contraception chez les personnes handicapées mentales. Avis et Rapport no49 Les Cahiers du Comité Consultatif National d’Ethique pour les sciences de la vie et de la santé. 1996;8:3–17.Google Scholar
Diederich, N, Greacen, T. Enquête sur la sexualité et la prévention du sida chez les adultes handicapés mentaux en Ile de France. Rev Eur Handicap Ment 1996;3:20–32.Google Scholar
Dorozynski, A. France to investigate illegal sterilisation of mentally ill patients. Br Med J 1997;315:1997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyer, O. Canadian women compensated for sterilisation. Br Med J 1996;312:330–1.Google ScholarPubMed
Elkins, TE, McNeely, SG, Punch, M, Kope, S, Heaton, C. Reproductive health concerns in down syndrome. A report of eight cases. J Reprod Med 1990;35:745–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Elkins, TE, Gafford, LS, Wilks, CS, Muram, D, Golden, G. A model clinic approach to the reproductive health concerns of the mentally handicapped. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:185–8.Google Scholar
Grover, SR. Menstrual and contraceptive management in women with an intellectual disability. Med J Aust 2002;176:108–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huovinen, K. Gynecological problems of mentally retarded women: a case–control study from southern Finland. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:475–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Ministerie van volksgezondheid en leefmilieu: Gezondheid in het federale Belgïe en zijn gemeenschappen: gecommentarieerde situati- eschets. Uitgave 1993.Google Scholar
Nash, ES, Navias, M. The therapeutic sterilisation of the mentally handicapped. Experience with the abortion and sterilisation act of 1975. South Afr Med J 1992;82:437–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Oddens, BJ, Lehert, P. Determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Great Britain and Germany 1: demographic factors. J Biosoc Sci 1997;29:415–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passer, A, Rauh, J, Chamberlain, A, McGrath, M, Burket, R. Issues in fertility control for mentally retarded female adolescents : II. Parental attitudes toward sterilisation. Pediatrics 1984;73:451–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Patterson-Keels, L, Quint, E, Brown, D, Larson, D, Elkins, TE. Family views on sterilisation for their mentally retarded children. J Reprod Med 1994;39:701–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinard, C. La strérilisation des handicapées mentales: la réponse à une pathologie sociale. Mémoire de licence en sociologie. Bordeaux: Université de Bordeaux II; 1996.Google Scholar
Servais, L, Hoyois, P, Roussaux, JP. Sterilizing people with learning disabilities: a problem belonging to the past? Eur J Ment Dis 2000;21: 4–16.Google Scholar
Servais, L, Jacques, D, Leach, R, Conod, L, Hoyois, P, Dan, B, Roussaux, JP. Contraception of women with intellectual disabilities: prevalence and determinants. J Int Dis Res 2002;46:108–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shet, S, Malpani, A. Vaginal hysterctomy for the management of the menstruation in mentally retarded women. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1991; 35:319–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Merwe, JV, Roux, JP. Sterilisation of mentally retarded persons. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1987;42:489–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeless, CR. Abdominal hysterectomy for surgical sterilisation in the mentally retarded: a review of parental opinion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975;122:872–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wingfield, M, Healy, D, Nicholson, A. Gynecological care for women with intellectual disability. Med J Aust 1994;160:536–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.