Eugenics is alive and well: a survey of genetic professionals around the world

Sci Context. 1998 Autumn-Winter;11(3-4):493-510. doi: 10.1017/s0269889700003173.

Abstract

A survey of 2901 genetics professionals in 36 nations suggests that eugenic thought underlies their perceptions of the goals of genetics and that directiveness in counseling after prenatal diagnosis leads to individual decisions based on pessimistically biased information, especially in developing nations of Asia and Eastern Europe. The "non-directive counseling" found in English-speaking nations is an aberration from the rest of the world. Most geneticists, except in China, rejected government involvement in premarital testing or sterilization, but most also held a pessimistic view of persons with genetic disabilities. Individual, but not state-coerced, eugenics survives in much modern genetic practice.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Abortion, Eugenic / psychology
  • Asia
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Australia
  • Cuba
  • Data Collection
  • Directive Counseling*
  • Disabled Persons / psychology
  • Eugenics*
  • Europe
  • Genetic Counseling / psychology*
  • Genetic Diseases, Inborn / prevention & control
  • Government Regulation
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Internationality*
  • Mandatory Programs
  • Neonatal Screening / psychology
  • North America
  • Premarital Examinations / psychology
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / psychology
  • South Africa
  • South America
  • Sterilization, Reproductive / psychology