Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the contraceptive knowledge and practices of women attending the abortion service at Epsom day unit, Green Lane Hospital.
Methods: Women attending the unit in December 1992 and January 1993 were asked to take part in the study. A questionnaire was administered to consenting women to assess demographic details and previous contraceptive education. If a contraceptive method was used the reason for failure was explored and if no method was used the reason for non use was explored.
Results: Sixty-one percent of women were using a contraceptive method in the month of conception. The condom was used by 48% and the pill by 42%. Eight percent of women had never used contraception and 30% were not using a method in the month of conception. Forty-three percent had a household income of less than $22,000 and financial barriers were the reason for non use in 32% of those not using a method. Of women who did not use contraception, only 11% used emergency contraception, whereas 78% of those surveyed said they knew about emergency contraception. Sixty-three percent of women said they had received enough contraceptive education to select and use a method effectively. Pacific Island women were least likely to have received adequate contraceptive education or to have been using a method of contraception.
Conclusions: A number of technical problems were identified with condom use. These problems need to be emphasised by sexuality education programmes and contraceptive prescribers. Omitting pills, diarrhoea, vomiting and drug interactions were important causes of pill failure. The seven day rule needs more emphasis when teaching women how to take the pill and when antibiotics are prescribed. Costs were an important barrier to the use of contraception for a significant proportion of women. Section 99 approval should be utilised more readily and the provision of free contraception, especially to low income groups, needs to be urgently explored.
PIP: The aim was to assess the contraceptive knowledge and practices of women obtaining abortions at Epsom day unit, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, in December 1992 and January 1993. A questionnaire was administered to consenting women. Of the 553 women asked to participate, 198 (35.89%) declined to enroll, thus leaving 355 participants with a mean age of 23 years. 60% were of European ethnicity. 43% had a yearly income of less than $22,000. Approximately half of those of Maori and Pacific Island descent were in the lowest income bracket. 36% had employment as their primary source of income, while 37% were supported by government benefits. 54.5% of the women were single, and 45% (299) were nulliparous. 63% had received enough contraceptive education to use a method effectively. Pacific Island and Asian women were less likely to have received adequate contraceptive education. 61% (217) of women were using a method in the month of conception. The condom was used by 48% of women, while oral contraception was used by 42%. Of the 9 women who used a diaphragm, 8 did not use it every time. Four women had used an IUD. Two women had used Depo Provera. Some women used a combination of condoms and natural family planning. Eight percent (28/355) had never used contraception, and 31% (111/355) were not using a method at the time of conception. 16 women (4.5%) used the emergency contraception pill within 72 hours of intercourse. Of those women who had not used contraception, only 13 (11.5%) used the emergency contraceptive pill. Of all the women in the study, 34% had used the emergency contraceptive pill previously and 78% had heard of it. Higher income level was associated with greater numbers of women using contraception. A logistic regression model showed an increased use of contraception with increased education (p=0.02). Maori and Pacific Islanders were less likely to use contraceptives (p= 0.002, p=0.0001).