You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Letters to the editor
Unintended pregnancy with subdermal implant following miscarriage: response from the CEU
  1. Louise Melvin, MRCOG, MFSRH
  1. Director, Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Sandyford, Glasgow, UK; louise.melvin@nhs.net

https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100239

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Dr Rank's letter.1 From her description of the case I calculate that the patient must have conceived 2 weeks after the first scan indicating possible miscarriage and attended for implant insertion before a urine pregnancy test would have been positive.

    This case illustrates two pitfalls that can lead to …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None