Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Choice of copper IUD or IUS in women attending a large SRH service
  1. Savita L Brito-Mutunayagam,, BMedSci
  1. Ailsa E Gebbie, FFSRH, FRCOG
  1. Gordon R Scott, BSc, FRCP
  1. Medical Student, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; S.L.Brito-Mutunayagam@sms.ed.ac.uk
  2. Consultant Gynaecologist, Chalmers Centre, Edinburgh, UK; ailsa.gebbie@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk
  3. Director and Consultant Physician, Chalmers Centre, Edinburgh, UK; Gordon.Scott2@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

There is a considerable cost differential between copper intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS) in the UK. Most contraceptive services face financial stringency and it is increasingly important to deliver cost-effective care whilst still offering patient choice. Although all long-acting reversible methods of contraception are cost effective,1 the cheapest copper IUD costs around £10 and lasts for 10 years, in contrast to an IUS that costs around £80 and lasts 5 years. Both are usually offered to all women but there could be significant cost savings to the National Health Service if more women used …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • *Corresponding author.

  • Competing interests None.