Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions
  1. Kate Cuschieri
  1. Director, Scottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Edinburgh, UK; Kate.Cuschieri@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Arbyn M, Roelens J, Simoens C, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;3:CD008054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008054.pub2

Low-grade cytological abnormalities of the cervix can be challenging to manage; while most will clear without intervention, between 10% and 20% could harbour high-grade lesions. Furthermore, low-grade abnormalities represent the largest category of abnormal results. In Scotland, of the 409 000 cervical screening tests that were performed in 2011–2012, 90.9% had a negative result, 1.3% had high-grade cellular changes and 7.8% had low-grade cellular changes.1

The high sensitivity and negative predictive value of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing has been exploited for the risk-stratification of low-grade abnormalities (often referred to as ‘triage’) with practice of this approach varying between and sometimes within countries. In the USA, HPV triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) is recommended by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and has been practised for several years, whereas in the UK it was rolled out only last year in England with no definitive plans for introduction …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests The author has received project funding from Roche, Abbott, Qiagen, GenProbe, NorChip and GlaxoSmithKline, has been an invited speaker for Sanofi Pasteur and is a previous member of a Genprobe advisory board.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.