You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Letters to the editor
Comment on ‘Embracing post-fertilisation methods of family planning: a call to action’: authors’ response
  1. Elizabeth G Raymond, MD, MPH
  1. Senior Medical Associate, Gynuity Health Projects, New York, NY, USA; eraymond@gynuity.org
  1. James Trussell, PhD
  1. Professor of Economics and Public Affairs, Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA and Visiting Professor, The Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK; trussell@princeton.edu
  1. Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, MD, PhD
  1. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Kristina.Gemzell@ki.se

https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100825

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Dr Gordon1 is uncomfortable with a family planning method that exerts its effect after fertilisation. However, a new study, published after our personal view article …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.