Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Pain and pain relief with intrauterine device insertion
  1. Rebecca H Allen
  1. Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rebecca H Allen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 101 Dudley Street, Providence, RI 02905, USA; rhallen{at}wihri.org

Statistics from Altmetric.com

In this journal issue, Speedie and colleagues1 examine whether the type of stabilising forceps (single-toothed tenaculum vs atraumatic forceps) applied to the cervix during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion influences the pain perceived among women who have had a vaginal delivery. They randomised 100 parous women and found that mean pain scores at the time of forceps application on a 0–10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) were 1.5±1.8 for the single-toothed tenaculum and 1.2±1.6 for the atraumatic (Littlewoods) forceps (p=0.52). As expected, pain scores for IUD insertion itself were low among this group of women (3.3±2.1, single-toothed tenaculum vs 2.7±2.2, atraumatic forceps, p=0.10). This finding is similar to a randomised controlled trial performed in the USA comparing single-toothed and atraumatic tenaculum types among 80 women undergoing IUD insertion, approximately half of whom had experienced a vaginal delivery.2

Intrauterine contraceptives are recommended as a first-line option for women of all ages by medical organisations due to their high efficacy and satisfaction rates.3 Providers have sought ways to make the insertion procedure more comfortable for women, given that some are deterred from this method due to fear of pain. The type of tenaculum used during IUD insertion seems to be joining other interventions for reducing pain that have been found in a recent Cochrane systematic review to have little effect or to be ineffective, depending on the specific patient group in which they are used.4 These include oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), some topical lidocaine agents, and misoprostol for cervical ripening. So, how can we counsel women and help them through the IUD insertion process?

First, we know that women who are nulligravid, nulliparous or remote from their last delivery may experience more pain with IUD insertion.5 The type of previous delivery matters, with the vaginal route, not abdominal, being protective against pain with intrauterine procedures. While populations differ according to the study location, on average, women who have had a vaginal delivery, especially recently, have mild discomfort with insertion as described by Speedie et al.1 Women who are nulliparous, have had only Caesarean deliveries, or are approaching the menopause tend to have more discomfort, in the range 5–6 on a 0–10 cm VAS. A minority of women will report severe levels of pain (i.e. a score of 7+). Second, the experience of pain is influenced by multiple factors and the level of pre-procedure anxiety and anticipated pain contributes significantly.5

Given these dynamics, a multimodal approach to reducing discomfort is necessary with any office gynaecological procedure. Such approaches were reviewed in this journal in 2014.6 Women should be counselled on what to expect during the insertion process, and having an assistant who can sit with the patient and distract her with conversation is also helpful, the so called ‘vocal local’ or ‘verbocaine’. A heating pad is another useful technique to reduce discomfort, provide distraction, and let the woman know that her comfort is a priority. Providers should use their clinical judgement regarding additional pharmacologic pain control options according to individual patient characteristics and be prepared to offer them. If additional pain control is needed, the best option most providers have access to is injected paracervical or intracervical anaesthesia. A paracervical block with 20 ml buffered 1% lidocaine, including injection at the tenaculum site, will provide some relief and acts immediately. Other lidocaine formulations that have been shown to be effective are 10% lidocaine spray and 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream; however, these need to be applied 3–7 minutes prior to the procedure.4 In addition, NSAIDs prior to the procedure will at least decrease uterine cramping after insertion, with naproxen and intramuscular ketorolac being two proven options. Further research in this area is always welcome, and emerging techniques under study include self-administered topical lidocaine agents placed vaginally 30–60 minutes prior to the procedure to allow for full absorption and onset of action, as well as inhaled nitrous oxide/oxygen.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests The author has served on an advisory board for Bayer and Actavis which manufacture intrauterine devices.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles