Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Postponing menstruation: choices and concerns
  1. Diana Mansour
  1. Consultant, Community Gynaecology and Reproductive Health Care, New Croft Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Dr Diana Mansour, Community Gynaecology and Reproductive Health Care, New Croft Centre, Market Street East, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 6ND, UK; diana.mansour{at}nuth.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Background

Since writing an editorial for this journal in 20141 I have been repeatedly asked about my views on postponing menstruation. Women in the 21st century want to avoid periods when on holiday yet have difficulty accepting highly effective, reversible forms of contraception which provide infrequent bleeding. Authors of a BMJ article published 16 years ago suggested that prescribing progestogens to delay periods was a lifestyle choice and should not be funded by the National Health Service.2 I am not sure I feel that strongly but I do think women need to know all options and any potential risks or side effects associated with each treatment – they may think twice.

Norethisterone

Only one drug is licensed to postpone menstruation in the UK and that is norethisterone. The Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) state that at low dose’ (5 mg three times a day) norethisterone may be used to treat “metropathia haemorrhagica, premenstrual syndrome, postponement of menstruation, dysmenorrhoea, endometriosis and menorrhagia”.3 There is limited evidence to support these indications1 but it does delay the onset of …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests Dr Mansour declares no support from any organisation for the submitted work. Dr Mansour has received research grants and honoraria for attending advisory board meetings, developing and delivering educational presentations from Aspen, Astellas, Bayer plc, Consilient Healthcare, HRA Pharma, Mithra, MSD and Vifor Pharma. No other relationships or activities have influenced the submitted work.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Highlights from this issue
    British Medical Journal Publishing Group