Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Women's health is not in focus in disaster zones: lessons from the Nepal earthquake
  1. Suraj B Thapa1,
  2. Ganesh Acharya2,3
  1. 1Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  2. 2Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3Women's Health and Perinatology Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
  1. Correspondence to Professor Ganesh Acharya, Women's Health and Perinatology Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Sykehusveien 38, Tromsø, Norway; ganesh.acharya@ki.se, ganesh.acharya{at}uit.no

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Nepal was hit by a powerful earthquake in 2015, causing enormous damage to physical infrastructure and human lives in many parts of the country. It caused serious threat to women's and children’s health both during and after the earthquake. An article in this issue of the journal highlights one easily forgotten hardship among many faced by women in this situation. Budhathoki and coworkers describe the difficulties surrounding menstrual hygiene in post-earthquake Nepal, where women used and reused clothes as sanitary towels – a practice that was considered culturally acceptable and feasible in crisis situations.1 The authors argue that menstrual hygiene received a low priority due to the overwhelming need of water, food and shelter in such crisis situations. An earlier report based on field visits carried out in temporary camps in Sindhupalchok district has also highlighted that menstruation and childbirth are considered natural physiological phenomena not requiring attention, and are not prioritised in disaster areas.2

Even before the earthquake, women's health had not been prioritised in Nepal, …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors Both authors equally contributed.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Personal view
    Shyam Sundar Budhathoki Meika Bhattachan Paras K Pokharel Madhurima Bhadra Edwin van Teijlingen
  • Highlights from this issue
    British Medical Journal Publishing Group