You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Letter
Essential services? Operating status of crisis pregnancy centres in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic
  1. Tara Murtha1,
  2. Kim C Clark2,
  3. Christy L Hall3,
  4. Wendy Lee Basgall4,
  5. Amy C Poyer5,
  6. M Jenifer McKenna6,
  7. Laura E Dodge7,8,9
  1. 1 Women’s Law Project, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  2. 2 Legal Voice, Seattle, Washington, USA
  3. 3 Gender Justice, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
  4. 4 Southwest Women’s Law Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
  5. 5 California Women’s Law Center, El Segundo, California, USA
  6. 6 The Alliance: State Advocates for Women's Rights & Gender Equality, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
  7. 7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  8. 8 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  9. 9 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Laura E Dodge, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA; ledodge{at}bidmc.harvard.edu

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201208

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    In March 2020, as COVID-19 rapidly spread across the United States, a singular question emerged: What are essential services? While anti-choice lawmakers attempted to classify abortion as non-essential despite professional medical associations affirming abortion to be essential, time-sensitive healthcare, little attention was paid to crisis pregnancy centres (CPCs). CPCs purport to assist ‘vulnerable’ pregnant people, but many use medical misinformation and misleading tactics to discourage pregnant people from abortion.1 Many CPCs attempt to present as medical offices, but most are staffed by unlicensed volunteers who provide over-the-counter pregnancy tests and non-diagnostic (‘keepsake’) ultrasounds.1 Their number is rapidly increasing and fuelled by public funding; CPCs now vastly outnumber abortion clinics nationwide.1

    The Alliance: State Advocates for Women’s Rights & Gender Equality is a collaboration of four state-based law and policy centres working for gender equality (Gender Justice, Legal Voice, Southwest Women’s Law Center and Women’s Law Project). With CPC project partner California Women’s Law Center, The Alliance maintains a database of CPCs in nine states (Alaska, California, Idaho, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Washington) using online …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @WomensLawProj, @Legal_Voice, @GenderJustice, @SWWomensLaw, @CWLC_la, @lauradodge

    • Correction notice This letter has been updated since it was published online. The authors noticed that they had mistakenly included an older set of proportions in the fourth paragraph. The corrected proportions are very similar to the incorrect ones and do not change any of their interpretations or necessitate any changes to the figure.

    • Funding This research was supported by an anonymous funder. The funder had no involvement in data collection, manuscript preparation or the decision to submit these findings for publication.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.