Article Text
Abstract
Introduction We explored whether routine pregnancy self-testing is feasible and acceptable to women at risk of late recognition of pregnancy as a strategy to facilitate early entry into either antenatal or abortion care.
Methods A feasibility study among South African sexually active women not desiring pregnancy within 1 year, and not using long-acting or injectable contraceptives. At recruitment, we provided five free urine pregnancy tests for self-testing on the first day of each of the next 3 months. We sent monthly text reminders to use the tests with requests for no-cost text replies. Our main outcome was the proportion of participants self-testing within 5 days of the text reminder over three consecutive months. Other outcomes were ease of use of tests, preference for self-testing versus clinic testing, acceptability of routine self-testing (all binary responses followed by open response options) and response to text messages (four-point Likert scale).
Results We followed up 71/76 (93%) participants. Two confirmed new pregnancies at the first scheduled test and completed exit interviews, and 64/69 (93%) self-reported completing all three monthly tests. Self-testing was easy to do (66/71, 93%); advantages were convenience (21/71, 30%) and privacy (18/71, 25%), while the main disadvantage was no nurse present to advise (17/71, 24%). Most would recommend monthly testing (70/71, 99%). Text reminders were generally not bothersome (57/71, 80%); 35/69 (51%) participants replied with test results over all three months.
Conclusion Providing free pregnancy tests to women at risk of late recognition of pregnancy is feasible to strengthen early confirmation of pregnancy status.
- health services accessibility
- patient participation
- reproductive behavior
Data availability statement
Deidentified participant data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Reuse is permissible following the authors' agreement to the proposed study protocol. (ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7176-9963)
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Deidentified participant data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Reuse is permissible following the authors' agreement to the proposed study protocol. (ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7176-9963)
Footnotes
Twitter @DrDGrossman
Contributors DC and DG were involved in the study design, and drafting and finalising the manuscript. DC conducted the study and did the analysis. SL managed the data, assisted with analysis, and reviewed the final manuscript.
Funding The study was funded by The Regents of the University of California (UCSF0108651).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.