Objective The study aim was to establish which demographic, clinical, reproductive and psychiatric factors are associated with self-reported hormonal contraceptive (HC)-induced adverse mood symptoms.
Study design We compiled baseline data from two Swedish studies: one cross-sectional study on combined oral contraceptive (COC)-induced adverse mood symptoms (n=118) and one randomised controlled trial on adverse mood symptoms on COC (n=184). Both included women eligible for COC use, aged over 18 years. All women answered a questionnaire on HC use and associated mood problems. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) was used to capture mood and anxiety disorders. Women who acknowledged HC-induced adverse mood symptoms, ongoing or previously (n=145), were compared with women without any such experience (n=157).
Results Compared with women without self-reported HC-induced adverse mood symptoms, women with these symptoms were younger at HC start (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.95), had more often undergone induced abortion (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.57 to 7.23), more often suffered from an ongoing minor depressive disorder (n=12 vs n=0) and had more often experienced any previous mental health problem (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.59).
Conclusions In line with previous research, this study suggests that women with previous or ongoing mental health problems and women who are younger at HC start are more likely to experience HC-induced adverse mood symptoms. Former and current mental health should be addressed at contraceptive counselling, and ongoing mental health disorders should be adequately treated.
Implications This study adds valuable knowledge for identification of women susceptible to HC-induced adverse mood symptoms. It should facilitate the assessment of whether or not a woman has an increased risk of such symptoms, and thus enable clinicians to adopt a more personalised approach to contraceptive counselling.
- contraception behavior
- hormonal contraception
- reproductive health
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors Study conception, planning, design and conduct: CL, ISP. Data interpretation: CL, AW, ISP. Statistical analysis: CL, ISP. Drafting of the manuscript: CL, ISP. Critical revision of the manuscript: CL, AW, MB, KGD, ISP.
Funding The Swedish Research Council (K2013-99X-22269-01-3) and the Family Planning Foundation supported this study.
Disclaimer No support was obtained from any pharmaceutical company. The funding source was not involved in the design of the study, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report or the decision to submit the article for publication.
Competing interests MB serves occasionally as medical advisor for Asarina Pharma. KGD reports honorarium for lectures from MSD/Merck, Bayer AG, Gedeon Richter, Exeltis, Azanta, HRA-Pharma, Mithra and Exelgyn, and her clinic has participated in clinical trials conducted by Exeltis, Mithra, Bayer, MSD, Removaid and Myovant. Over the past 5 years, ISP has served occasionally on advisory boards or acted as an invited speaker at scientific meetings for MSD, Bayer Health Care, Gedeon Richter, Peptonics, Shire/Takeda and Lundbeck A/S.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Data availability statement As far as is practicable, data will be available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.