Statistics from Altmetric.com
Concurrent with the global COVID-19 pandemic, studies have identified an increased prevalence of sexual and intimate partner violence.1 In the Republic of Ireland, six Sexual Assault Treatment Units (SATUs) provide around-the-clock forensic, physical, preventative and supportive care for people over the age of 14 years who disclose sexual violence. All six SATUs have remained operational without limitation throughout the period of the pandemic. We here summarise the Irish SATU experience for a 10-month period during the pandemic, starting when the first case of COVID-19 was diagnosed in Ireland and comparing our findings with the same time period in 2019.
Comparing attendances between 1 March and 31 December 2019 (pre-COVID) and 1 March and 31 December 2020, we found several notable features of attendances at the SATU network (table 1).
Overall, the number of attendances nationally at the SATUs decreased by 27%. There are several reasons why this may have been the case, including a reduction in sexual violence, a fear of exposure to COVID-19, as well as a perceived lack of availability of services. Analysis did not identify any differences in terms of gender or age category of attendees, although fewer university students attended in the 2020 period.
As regards the assailant, they were more likely to be an ‘intimate/ex-intimate partner/family member’ compared with assailants in 2019, with a significant drop in assailants categorised as ‘stranger or recent acquaintance’ (412 vs 227; p<0.001). Other countries have also highlighted that intimate partner violence including sexual violence has increased since the onset of COVID-19.2
The number of patients that were seen by SATU staff within 3 hours of making initial contact has remained the same despite the added complexities of infection prevention and control measures. From a service provision perspective, we have adapted our practice to reduce the risk of COVID-19 exposure. This included questionnaire-based screening prior to any attendance at a SATU, with referral for COVID-19 testing if indicated. Face-to-face contact with patients was reduced (initially by using the telephone for history taking and then moving to videocall when the appropriate equipment was obtained), appropriate personal protective equipment was used and footfall in the SATU was reduced (eg, the number of accompanying persons was reduced).
Disclosures of incidents that occurred during night-time hours were reduced in the 2020 period compared with the 2019 period (70% vs 80%; p<0.001). This may relate to government restrictions including limitations on gatherings and the closure of bars and nightclubs. Interestingly, alcohol consumption in those who attended was lower in the 2020 period, with an increased number of people attending who had not consumed any alcohol in the 24 hours prior to the assault. Concerns about drug-facilitated sexual assault were similar.
In-person psychological support at the time of SATU attendance was significantly lower in the 2020 period due to restrictions and infection prevention and control measures. Information on psychological services is provided at the time of SATU attendance; however, we are aware that some attendees will not contact these serivces, which will inevitably lead to a decrease in victims availing themselves of post-assault psychological care. Offering videocalling may mitigate this, and this course of action should be considered if restrictions are sustained.
Overall experience of the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that sexual violence is still prevalent despite widespread government-imposed restrictions. This study highlights that sexual violence, and its prevention, is complex and cannot just focus on myths and assumptions. Interventions across the whole of society are required to reduce it. Furthermore, we have highlighted operational adaptions that have allowed us to maintain a fully operational and responsive SATU service nationally.
Ethical approval was sought from the Research Advisory Group (RAG) in the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.