Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Changes in male permanent contraception as partner access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) increases: an analysis of the National Survey for Family Growth, 2006–2010 versus 2017–2019
    1. 1Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
    2. 2School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
    3. 3Division of Primary Care & Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
    1. Correspondence to Dr Isabel Beshar, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA; ibeshar{at}stanford.edu

    Abstract

    Objective Male permanent contraception (PC), that is, vasectomy, is an effective way of preventing pregnancy. In the United States, male PC use has historically been concentrated among higher-educated/higher-income males of White race. In the last decade, use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) has increased dramatically. We sought to understand how sociodemographic patterns of male PC have changed in the context of rising LARC use.

    Study design We examined the nationally representative male public use files of the National Survey for Family Growth (NSFG) across five survey waves. Our outcome was primary contraceptive use at last sexual encounter within 12 months. Using four-way multinomial logistic regressions (male PC, female PC, LARC, lower-efficacy methods), we compared sociodemographic factors predictive of male PC use versus reported partner LARC use between 2006–2010 (early) and 2017–2019 (recent) waves.

    Results We included 15 964 participants. From 2006 to 2019, there were absolute declines in male PC from 8.0% to 6.8%, while male-reported partner LARC use increased three-fold, from 3.4% to 11.0%. Among the highest economic strata, use of LARC converged with male PC. In adjusted analyses, high income significantly associated with male PC use in the early wave (OR 4.6 (1.4, 14.8)), but no longer in the recent wave (OR 0.9 (0.2, 4.2)). Marital status remained a significant but declining predictor of male PC across survey waves, and instead, by 2019, number of children newly emerged as the strongest predictor of male PC use.

    Conclusion Sociodemographic variables associated with vasectomy use are evolving, especially among high-income earners.

    • Contraceptive Agents, Male
    • Contraceptive Agents, Female
    • long-acting reversible contraception
    • intrauterine devices

    Data availability statement

    Data are available in a public, open access repository. The National Survey for Family Growth (NSFG) is a publicly available dataset.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    Data are available in a public, open access repository. The National Survey for Family Growth (NSFG) is a publicly available dataset.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • X @isabelbeshar, @drericacahll

    • Presented at Published following the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Annual Clinical Meeting (May 2021, virtual format) and Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Symposium (October 2023, in-person event).

    • Contributors IB and JGS conceptualised the study and its methodology. JYS contributed to the statistical analysis. JGS, EPC and KAS contributed substantive editorial input. IB submitted the study. IB is the study guarantor.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.