eLetters

8 e-Letters

published between 2015 and 2018

  • Endometrial sampling has been undertaken for many years in some general practices.
    It was very pleasing to see a paper reporting a pilot study of Primary care endometrial sampling1as this was something I have been involved with over the last 25 years, although I was a little disappointed that there was no reference to some of the previous work on this subject in primary care2. I published two papers on the subject in 1998, The first considered the end of the operation Dilatation and Curettage (D & C) which until the 1990s had been the investigation of choice for abnormal uterine bleeding and the emergence of new techniques such as Pipelle sampling3. The second paper I published was entitled Endometrial sampling in general practice and was a case series of 38 women investigated for unexpected vaginal bleeding4. I had introduced the procedure to the Honiton Practice in 1993; having held the qualification for intrauterine techniques for many years and having acquired further training from the local gynaecology department and taken advice from the relevant defence unions. It was not part of General Medical Services then and under new general practice arrangements it was recognized as ‘provision of secondary care within primary care’ and remunerated. It is also important to realize that the current 2 week wait referral procedure did not exist and sometimes women with abnormal bleeding could w...
    Show More
  • Second doctor signature on HSA forms

    The move to single visit medical abortion[1] will be a great improvement in convenience to clients. The requirement of two doctors to sign the HSA form results in many attending and sometimes waiting for hours purely to obtain a signed form. This inconvenience could easily be removed by distant signing of such forms. In a service such as ours with an electronic patient record, readily accessed at a remove, the requirement for such attendance seems especially egregious.

    Reference
    1 Lord J, Regan L, Kasliwal A, et al. Early medical abortion: best practice now lawful in Scotland and Wales but not available to women in England. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2018;44:155–8.

  • A better way to judge fertility awareness, and the need for a better app

    In their article about Natural Cycles, Hough et al quote a Cochrane Review that dismisses fertility awareness based contraception (natural family planning).
    A Cochrane Review is an understandable choice but not an appropriate one. It would be more helpful to quote NHS Choices, the Family Planning Association or Faculty Guidance, which all have a more nuanced approach to the evidence, and say that fertility awareness is up to 99% effective.
    Typical use rates are lower but many women achieve high effectiveness thanks to either their own research or appropriate support. Books like “Taking Charge of Your Fertility” by Toni Weschler, websites like Fertility UK and apps such as Kindara, Cycle Beads and Ovuview have helped women to avoid (and plan) pregnancy for years. There is also NHS-funded fertility awareness support in some areas.
    Natural Cycles is the new app that is revolutionising fertility awareness thanks to huge amounts of funding for marketing and research and a clean design that removes all judgement from the user (in a similar way to CycleBeads) and simply pronounces a day “red” or “green”.
    The accessibility, if not the advertising, of Natural Cycles is welcome. Women need options. But it is not ideal.
    Advertising is one issue. As Hough et al describe, because Natural Cycles is not a prescribed product, and because they have substantial financial resources, they are able to bypass health professionals and advertise direct to potential c...

    Show More
  • Comment on ‘Early medical abortion: best practice now lawful in Scotland and Wales but not available to women in England’

    Jonathan Lord, Lesley Regan and colleagues make a strong case for allowing home use of misoprostol in early medical abortion. Indeed it has been obvious for some years ever since the WHO reviewed research trials in various countries. Isn't this really the time to make both abortifacients, mifepristone and misoprostol, available off prescription?

    They are safe, reliable and easy to use. Complications requiring further medical attention after self-administration are only marginally more common than when supervised by medical staff. Dire results are rare. Is this the time to recognise that the present, medically supervised, regulated system has been outflanked by pharmaceutical technology?

    In fact abortion has become so easy that many women obviously prefer it to contraception. In 2017 approximately 74 000 abortions in England & Wales (39% of the total) were for women who had had at least one before. Whether or not repeated abortion by medical means in early pregnancy is undesirable or even harmful does not seem to have been established.

    Pills over the counter would be a popular innovation because it would enable a pregnant woman to achieve a termination more quickly and with greater privacy than now. She would, for example, not need to run the gauntlet of abortion protesters outside clinics.

    Of course there are snags and difficulties. It could not be done without a change in the laws which currently forbid self-induction of abortion and r...

    Show More
  • Home use of misoprostol: is it really safe and appreciated?

    Regarding the Scottish decision on home abortion of 26th October 2017, Lord J, Regan L, Kasliwal A, et al. claim that "Home use of misoprostol in Scotland is relatively new. The larger abortion services in Scotland report widescale uptake of home use of misoprostol among women and that it is highly appreciated with no negative impact on services." The Scottish “abortion services” consulted are not named and the reference for the bold claim that home use of misoprostol is “highly appreciated” is “S Cameron [co-author], personal communication 2018”. Such statements do not inspire confidence.

    In response to some other claims made in the article: women having better control over timing in practice will mean less precision in timing, since medical supervision is supposed to guarantee ‘correct’ time between drugs and a ‘correct’ route of administration, whether sublingual, buccal or vaginal. If these are departed from, the effectiveness goes down, and the complications go up. This is well-known.

    As regards travel and onset of bleeding, the Creinin paper [1] referred to by the authors had a bleeding onset median time of 2 hours for the standard (misoprostol taken 24 hours after mifepristone), and 3.7 hours when mifepristone and misoprostol were taken together. Others state that the onset of bleeding with the standard regimen was after 2 hours and meant light to moderate spotting at 4 hours after misoprostol [2]. Depending on the travel time, there m...

    Show More
  • Comment on "Barriers and facilitators of access to first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review"
    Julie Ancian

    The article of Frances Doran and Susan Nancarrow [1] suggests that there is a need for more research about the barriers to access to abortion services in developed countries. I totally agree with this finding, especially for qualitative research, and would like to provide a point of view from France.

    As part of my doctoral research on the social determinants of reproductive health, I attended the trial of Domin...

    Show More
  • "Mandatory counseling" is a misnomer
    Christian Fiala

    Counseling is voluntary by definition. A person being 'counseled' can leave at any time and without any consequences. If 'counseling' is mandatory it becomes in fact a state ordered instruction. Like for example in the case of obligatory military service. We as society should at least have the courage to name things with their correct terminology. And not pretend to 'counsel' women if in fact we force them to listen to an...

    Show More
  • Response to Mini-Commentary on 'Would an exclusive contraceptive clinic help meet the needs of patients attending an integrated sexual health clinic?'
    Diana Mansour

    It was interesting to read Sharon Moses' thoughtful commentary questioning the role of an 'express' contraceptive service in a community sexual health clinic and advocating improving contraceptive provision in primary care, the primary provider of contraception in the UK.[1] My colleagues in Newcastle, however, support this service innovation as they feel that women in their late teens and early twenties have been overl...

    Show More