64 e-Letters

  • Unusual shaped IUS
    Alwyn R N Lloyd

    I read with interest Anne MacGregor's letter in the January 2013 issue of the Journal describing the removal of an unusually shaped intrauterine system (IUS) and asking if others have had similar experiences.[1]

    A couple of years ago I too was alarmed as I removed an IUS through a slightly tight cervical os and noted an odd shape. On closer inspection the device was removed intact but as in Dr MacGregor's case t...

    Show More
  • Comment on 'Impact of UK Medical Eligibility Criteria implementation on prescribing of combined hormonal contraceptives': author's response
    Paula Briggs

    On behalf of all the authors I would like to thank Sarah Holden for her comments[1] on our recently published article.[2]

    When designing the study, we recognised that the majority of women receive their contraception from their general practitioner (GP). Our study compares the prescribing habits of GPs in 2005 pre-UK Medical Eligibility Criteria (pre-UKMEC) to those in 2010 (post-UKMEC).

    Whilst the aut...

    Show More
  • Early implant removal
    Jane M Wilson

    I read the letter on 'Early implant removal: an ethical dilemma' by Bari et al.[1] in the January 2013 issue of the Journal with interest, a great feeling of disappointment and I shared the feelings of alarm with the authors. The piece reported a 29-year-old woman who was so dissatisfied with her subdermal implant that she attempted removal herself without anaesthetic and she broke the device. She had requested removal f...

    Show More
  • Comment on 'Impact of UK Medical Eligibility Criteria implementation on prescribing of combined hormonal contraceptives'
    Sarah E Holden

    I read the article by Briggs and colleagues[1] with interest as it is, to my knowledge, the only study to assess the impact of the implementation of the UK Medical Eligibility Criteria on general practice prescribing of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in the UK. However, I have a study limitation.

    As the authors have stated, oral contraception can be accessed on prescription from a general practitioner (...

    Show More
  • Response to an unusual shaped IUS
    Adam Forrest

    I read with interest Dr MacGregor's letter[1] regarding the unusual shape of a Mirena intrauterine system (IUS) following removal. From the photograph it would appear that the capsule has become displaced and the arms of the device enclosed within it.

    We have seen a case of complete detachment of the capsule from the frame, with unrecognised retention of the capsule within the uterine cavity. This was only reco...

    Show More
  • Learning from Romanian women's struggle to manage their fertility
    Ann Furedi

    The commentary by Horga et al.[1] on the consequences of Ceausescu's attempt to ban abortion in Romania is a stark reminder of what happens when women are prevented from accessing safe and legal means to end problem pregnancies. In short, they end their pregnancies using means that are unlawful and/or unsafe, sometimes with tragic consequences.

    Although it is difficult to compare any country today with the repre...

    Show More
  • Contraceptive options for women with SLE: response to Mansour letter
    Kelly R Culwell

    We thank Dr Mansour for her interest in our article[1] and for her provocative questioning of the recommendations for use of progestogen-only contraceptives by women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who test positive for anti-phospholipid antibodies.[2] We are sensitive to any reductions in choice of contraceptive methods, particularly for women in whom pregnancy has significant health consequences, such as women w...

    Show More
  • Contraceptive options for women with SLE
    Diana Mansour

    May I congratulate the authors of the commentary describing contraceptive options for women with systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE).[1] This was a comprehensive summary and I was interested in their views regarding the suitability of progestogen-only methods in women with antiphospholipid antibodies. The authors felt these methods were unsafe in such women (World Health Organization Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contr...

    Show More
  • Nurse SRH training and accreditation in Hull, UK
    Marian Everett

    We write in response to the article in the July 2012 issue of this Journal by Shelley Mehigan and Janice Burnett entitled 'An innovative training for nurses in sexual health'[1]. We agree wholeheartedly that a nationally recognised, standardised training for nurses in sexual and reproductive health is needed and that the best way forward may be for the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) to accredit nurse...

    Show More
  • Nurse training and accreditation
    Myra Lamont

    I have read with interest in this Journal, since my retirement, the continuing debate over nurse training and accreditation by the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) and am saddened that there is still no resolution. Indeed, the October 2012 issue of the Journal included three letters on this very topic [1-3].

    Nurse and midwifery training is validated through universities at diploma or graduat...

    Show More