RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 A comparative study of clinical management strategies for vaginal discharge in family planning and genitourinary medicine settings JF Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care JO J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care FD British Medical Journal Publishing Group SP 26 OP 30 DO 10.1783/0000000052973112 VO 31 IS 1 A1 Catriona Melville A1 Rak Nandwani A1 Alison Bigrigg A1 Alex D McMahon YR 2005 UL http://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/31/1/26.abstract AB Objective To compare strategies for management of women with vaginal discharge in genitourinary medicine (GUM) and family planning (FP) settings. Methods The setting was a centre housing both FP and GUM departments within a primary care trust in Scotland. The study participants were 200 women presenting with vaginal discharge. A randomised, controlled, crossover design was employed. Strategies typical of FP and GUM were performed on every participant in a randomised sequence. Day 1 diagnoses were made by the FP strategy (history and examination) and the GUM strategy (nearpatient microscopy added). Day 7 results were obtained from final analysis of all specimens. Days 1 and 7 results were compared with the reference standard provided by all the test results. The main outcome measures were incorrect diagnoses on Days 1 and 7. Results On Day 1 the FP strategy resulted in significantly more incorrect diagnoses than the GUM strategy when compared with the reference standard (73 vs 32; p <0.001). On Day 7 the GUM strategy resulted in significantly more incorrect diagnoses than the FP strategy when compared with the reference standard (32 vs 17; p = 0.019). Conclusions Vaginal discharge can be managed effectively in community settings such as FP and primary care. The addition of near-patient microscopy produces a more accurate immediate diagnosis. The addition of a high vaginal swab for culture produces a more accurate final diagnosis. The costs of on-site microscopy must be considered.