PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Jessica Loaring
AU  - Matthew Hickman
AU  - Isabel Oliver
AU  - Rona Campbell
AU  - Caroline Trotter
AU  - John Macleod
AU  - Karl Pye
AU  - Joanna Crichton
AU  - Paddy Horner
TI  - Could a peer-led intervention increase uptake of chlamydia screening? A proof of principle pilot study
AID  - 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100151
DP  - 2013 Jan 01
TA  - Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care
PG  - 21--28
VI  - 39
IP  - 1
4099  - http://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/39/1/21.short
4100  - http://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/39/1/21.full
SO  - J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care2013 Jan 01; 39
AB  - Background Uptake of the English National Chlamydia Screening Programme is lower than predicted necessary to result in a rapid fall in chlamydia prevalence. Peer-led approaches may increase screening uptake but their feasibility and acceptability to young people is not known. Methods Focus groups and interviews with young women and men. Following interview, chlamydia postal kits were introduced to participants and their opinions on giving these out to their peers sought. Participants were asked for their views and experiences of discussing chlamydia screening and distributing kits to their friends 4–8 weeks after the focus group/interview. All kits returned to the laboratory over a 9-month period were recorded. Results Six men (mean age 19 years) and six women (mean age 20 years) were recruited. In total 45 kits were distributed, 33 (73%) to female participants. 22 (67%) and 3 (25%) of kits given to females and males, respectively, were given to peers. Ten kits (22%; seven female, three male) all of which had been given out by females, were returned for testing. Participants generally felt positive about the idea of peer-led screening (PLS) using postal kits. However, embarrassment was a key theme, particularly among men. Generally women but not men were able to discuss PLS among their close friends. Both sexes felt PLS would be easier if kits were readily available in multiple sites, and chlamydia screening was more widely promoted. Conclusion Female PLS but not male PLS was successful in recruiting peers to participate in chlamydia screening. An evaluation of the acceptability and cost-effectiveness of PLS is now indicated.