@article {Bos{\'o} P{\'e}rez12, author = {Raquel Bos{\'o} P{\'e}rez and David Reid and Karen J Maxwell and Jo Gibbs and Emily Dema and Christopher Bonell and Catherine H Mercer and Pam Sonnenberg and Nigel Field and Kirstin R Mitchell}, title = {Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences}, volume = {49}, number = {1}, pages = {12--20}, year = {2023}, doi = {10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201413}, publisher = {British Medical Journal Publishing Group}, abstract = {Introduction Access to quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services remains imperative even during a pandemic. Our objective was to understand experiences of delayed or unsuccessful access to SRH services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods In October and November 2020 we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 14 women and six men reporting an unmet need for SRH services in the Natsal-COVID survey, a large-scale quasi-representative web-panel survey of sexual health and behaviour during COVID-19 (n=6654). We purposively sampled eligible participants using sociodemographic quotas. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore service access and quality and to identify lessons for future SRH service delivery.Results Twenty participants discussed experiences spanning 10 SRH services including contraception and antenatal/maternity care. Participants reported hesitancy and self-censorship of need. Accessing telemedicine and {\textquoteleft}socially-distanced{\textquoteright} services required tenacity. Challenges included navigating changing information and procedures; perceptions of gatekeepers as obstructing access; and inflexible appointment systems. Concerns about reconfigured services included reduced privacy; decreased quality of interactions with professionals; reduced informal support; and fewer preventive SRH practices. However, some participants also described more streamlined services and staff efforts to compensate for disruptions. Many viewed positively the ongoing blending of telemedicine with in-person care.Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic impacted access and quality of SRH services. Participants{\textquoteright} accounts revealed self-censorship of need, difficulty navigating shifting service configurations and perceived quality reductions. Telemedicine offers potential if intelligently combined with in-person care. We offer initial evidence-based recommendations for promoting an equitable restoration and future adaption of services.Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data are available upon reasonable request. Natsal-COVID qualitative interview data are available upon request from researchers. If interested, please contact kirstin.mitchell@glasgow.ac.uk. Quantitative data from this study are available from the UK Data Archive under safeguarded access, DOI: 10.5255/UKDA-SN-8865-1.}, issn = {2515-1991}, URL = {https://srh.bmj.com/content/49/1/12}, eprint = {https://srh.bmj.com/content/49/1/12.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Sexual \& Reproductive Health} }