Table 2A

Contraceptive methods previously used by non-migrant, migrant and second-generation migrant women seeking abortion care in Stockholm County (multiple choices possible)

Contraceptive methodNon-migrant
(n (%))
Migrant
(n (%))
Second-generation
(n (%))
Total
(n (%))
P value
Pills374 (89.0)83 (63.4)49 (80.3)506 (82.7)<0.001
Condoms230 (54.8)65 (49.6)29 (47.5)324 (52.9)0.396
Withdrawal99 (23.6)16 (12.2)8 (13.1)123 (20.1)0.006
Copper IUD70 (16.7)31 (23.7)6 (9.8)107 (17.5)0.047
Implant60 (14.3)18 (13.7)14 (23.0)92 (15.0)0.187
Vaginal ring67 (16.0)13 (9.9)10 (16.4)90 (14.7)0.218
Rhythm method62 (14.8)14 (10.7)7 (11.5)83 (13.6)0.435
Hormonal IUS34 (8.1)7 (5.3)4 (6.6)45 (7.4)0.587*
Patch16 (3.8)2 (1.5)1 (1.6)19 (3.1)0.460*
Injection12 (2.9)3 (2.3)2 (3.3)17 (2.8)0.857*
Other†18 (4.3)7 (5.3)3 (4.9)28 (4.6)
LARC‡135 (31.8)46 (31.1)23 (35.9)204 (32.0)0.770
  • *Fischer’s exact test.

  • †The methods grouped as ‘other’ included, for example, lactational amenorrhea, diaphragms and emergency contraceptive pills.

  • ‡LARC=IUD/IUS and implant.

  • IUD, intrauterine device; IUS, intrauterine system; LARC, long-acting reversible contraception.