Original research articleBringing emergency contraception over the counter: experiences of nonprescription users in France, Norway, Sweden and Portugal
Introduction
Emergency contraception (EC) has long been used by women around the world as a postcoital means of preventing unwanted pregnancies. Until recently, women seeking EC needed to obtain a physician's prescription, a constraint to optimal use of the method since studies demonstrate that EC is most effective when taken immediately following unprotected intercourse [1], [2]. In an effort to increase access to emergency contraceptives, several pharmaceutical companies have begun to produce progestin-only (levonorgestrel 750 μg) products, such as Norlevo and Plan B. Unlike earlier combined estrogen/progestin methods, progestin-only EC products have no medical contraindications and can therefore be safely delivered without a prescription. Over the past few years, progestin-only EC products have been registered as a nonprescription method in over 25 countries [3]. Given the novelty of this nonprescription service delivery, we felt that it was critical to document the experience of nonprescription EC users. We expect that data gathered in this study will inform EC policy, educational campaigns and service delivery guidelines.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
We conducted a series of focus-group discussions with women who had obtained and used EC without a medical prescription in large, urban centers in France, Norway, Portugal and Sweden in 2001 and 2002 (Table 1). Focus groups were used to facilitate open debates about the method. Study teams in each country led four to five focus groups, each lasting from 60 to 90 min. Informed consent was given prior to participation in the discussions. Inclusion criteria and research instruments were common to
Participant characteristics
Background information from the questionnaire is presented in Table 3. Overall, participants in the four sites were similar in age, pregnancy history and marital status.
Perceptions and misconceptions of EC prior to use
While all of the participants said they knew of the “morning-after pill,” concrete knowledge about how to use and obtain EC was limited. When probed about her knowledge of the method, a Norwegian participant summed up the view of many of her counterparts, stating, “I really think I have always known that a morning after pill
Discussion and conclusions
This study presents data on users' experiences with non-prescription access to EC in France, Norway, Portugal and Sweden. While these data are not representative of the experience of all nonprescription EC users, they do provide an important glimpse into the experiences of women in these countries. Our results demonstrate that EC users in these four countries consistently find nonprescription access to be an acceptable service delivery mechanism for this method. The women interviewed were able
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Robert H. Ebert Program in Critical Issues in Reproductive Health and HRA Pharma.
References (4)
- et al.
Timing of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel or the Yuzpe regimen. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
New options in contraception for adolescents
Curr Womens Health Rep
(2001)
Cited by (60)
Pharmacy-based initiatives to reduce unintended pregnancies: A scoping review
2021, Research in Social and Administrative PharmacyCitation Excerpt :Consequently, barriers to access were provider-related,45 in addition to logistical/system (reduced pharmacy trading hours in regional areas/on weekends and cost) and personal (embarrassment). Further patient-related concerns were women's perceptions of pharmacists' professional competency,41 although participants' preference for pharmacy EC access over clinic access was demonstrated by most studies that addressed this outcome.27,29,41,43 Bridging interventions were received favourably by patients for the ease they facilitated access.41
Requests for emergency contraception in community pharmacy: An evaluation of services provided to mystery patients
2013, Research in Social and Administrative PharmacyEctopic pregnancy after levonorgestrel emergency contraception
2011, ContraceptionCitation Excerpt :This figure falls to 58% if the therapy is delayed up to 48 to 72 h [2]. The first European approval of LNG EE on a nonprescription basis (behind-the-counter) was granted in France in 1999, and an off-the-shelf use of LNG (Norlevo®) was approved in Norway in 2000 [3,4]. According to the literature, LNG EE inhibits or delays ovulation and possibly prevents fertilization by affecting the cervical mucus or the ability of sperm to bind to the ovum [5].
Emergency contraception in Australian community pharmacies: A simulated patient study
2011, ContraceptionCitation Excerpt :The ECP is more effective the earlier it is taken following unprotected intercourse, thus timely access is critical [4–7]. Previous international studies have documented a strong need for increased access, with overwhelming support from the public for direct pharmacy provision [8]. To facilitate its timely use and maximize potential public health benefit, Australia joined the worldwide movement to increase ECP availability by rescheduling the levonorgestrel ECP from a Prescription Only (S4) to a Pharmacist Only (S3) medicine in January 2004 [3].
Pharmacy access to the emergency contraceptive pill: A national survey of a random sample of Australian women
2011, ContraceptionCitation Excerpt :Less than half thought it was the role of the pharmacist to give women advice about contraception and STIs at the time the ECP is obtained. Other studies have reported similar findings [44,45]. Although it has previously been suggested that women are in a receptive frame of mind when obtaining the ECP from the pharmacy and that this opportunity could be used to counsel them about longer-term contraception [5], our results indicate that women would not welcome this approach.