Follow-up visits after IUD insertion. Are more better?

J Reprod Med. 1999 Sep;44(9):801-6.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether frequent follow-up visits for intrauterine device (IUD) users prevents the development of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).

Study design: A prospective, cohort design was used to study 1,713 women who received an IUD in 1992 in Mexico. They were divided into two different follow-up regimens and were asked to return for either two or four revisits in the first year after insertion. The main outcome measures included incidence of PID and asymptomatic/symptomatic lower genital tract infections. Time to detection of lower genital tract infections was measured in a proportional hazards regression model; this analysis achieved 90% power to detect differences between the regimens.

Results: The two regimens were nearly identical in terms of PID incidence. The incidence rates for asymptomatic and symptomatic lower genital tract infection were slightly higher in the four-visit regimen; however, the incidence rate ratios were not statistically elevated: 1.41 (0.77-2.56) and 1.23 (0.67-2.27), respectively. In the regression, the variable denoting follow-up regimen was not associated with time to detection of lower genital tract infection.

Conclusion: More follow-up visits for IUD users provide no benefit in terms of preventing PID or progression toward the disease.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Genital Diseases, Female / diagnosis
  • Genital Diseases, Female / etiology
  • Humans
  • Infections / diagnosis
  • Infections / etiology
  • Intrauterine Devices, Copper / adverse effects*
  • Pelvic Inflammatory Disease / diagnosis
  • Pelvic Inflammatory Disease / etiology
  • Physical Examination
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors